<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Disability Attorney &#187; Hearings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disabilitytse.com/category/hearings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com</link>
	<description>Tom S. Ebbinghouse, Attorney At Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:54:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Average Processing Times at Indiana Social Security Office of Disability Adjudication and Review</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/average-processing-times-at-indiana-social-security-office-of-disability-adjudication-and-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/average-processing-times-at-indiana-social-security-office-of-disability-adjudication-and-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilitytse.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The processing time for Indianapolis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The processing time for Indianapolis Social Security Disability Hearings at the Office of Adjudication and Review (ODAR) has fallen again. As reported elsewhere on this site, in November 2009, the number of days from the filing of a Request for Hearing until the case was completed at the hearing site averaged 579 days. In April of 2009, it was 738 days, in June of 2008 it was 896 days, and as of March 26, 2010 it was 534 days. As of April 29, 2011, the number of days from the Request for Hearing for average processing at the Indianapolis ODAR was 428 days, Fort Wayne, Indiana was at 340 days, the new Valparaiso, Indiana office was at 301 days and the Evansville, Indiana office was now at 298 days. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/average-processing-times-at-indiana-social-security-office-of-disability-adjudication-and-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Processing Time at Indianapolis ODAR Falls Again!</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/processing-time-at-indianapolis-odar-falls-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/processing-time-at-indianapolis-odar-falls-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjudication·Benefit From·Claimant·Disability Benefits·Disability Claim·Disability Hearings·Evansville Indiana·Ft Wayne·Ft Wayne Indiana·Heariings·Indianapolis·Indianapolis Office·Odar·Postings·Proces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disabilitytse.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Processing time at the Indianapolis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Processing time at the Indianapolis Office of Disability Adjudication and Review has fallen again. As reported elsewhere on this site, in November 2009, the number of days  from the filing of a Request for Hearing until the case was completed  at the hearing site averaged 579 days. In April of 2009, it was 738 days  and in June of 2008 it was 896 days. As of March 26, 2010, the number  of days from the Request for Hearing for average processing at the  Indianapolis ODAR was 534 days. As of February 1, 2011, average processing time had fallen to 505 days.  Progress continues to be made!</p>
<p>In Fort Wayne, as of February 1, 2011, average processing time had fallen to 411 days. Evansville is at 318 days, and the recently opened Valparaiso office is at 285 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/processing-time-at-indianapolis-odar-falls-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Processing Time for Indianapolis Social Security Disability Hearings Falls Again!</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/processing-time-for-indianapolis-social-security-disability-hearings-falls-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/processing-time-for-indianapolis-social-security-disability-hearings-falls-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adjudication·Benefit From·Claimant·Disability Benefits·Disability Claim·Disability Hearings·Evansville Indiana·Ft Wayne·Ft Wayne Indiana·Heariings·Indianapolis·Indianapolis Office·Odar·Postings·Proces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The processing time for Indianapolis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The processing time for Indianapolis Social Security Disability Hearings at the Office of Adjudication and Review (ODAR) has fallen again. As reported elsewhere on this site, in November 2009, the number of days from the filing of a Request for Hearing until the case was completed at the hearing site averaged 579 days. In April of 2009, it was 738 days and in June of 2008 it was 896 days. As of March 26, 2010, the number of days from the Request for Hearing for average processing at the Indianapolis ODAR was <strong>534 days</strong>. The Indianapolis office now ranks 130 out of 144 hearing offices. Processing time for Evansville Indiana (rank 86) is now at 460 days and Ft. Wayne Indiana (ranked 115) is at 509 days.</p>
<p>If you check in the archives of this site  for the other postings for processing time, you will be able to see the other rankings for past times. Indianapolis has improved so that it no longer hovers in last or next to last place, and it has not for many months now. Be sure you check out the Archives for postings on many different issues connected to a Social Security Disability claim or you are not getting the full benefit from this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/processing-time-for-indianapolis-social-security-disability-hearings-falls-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indianapolis Social Security Disability Cases Appeal Processing Time Continues to Fall!</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indianapolis-social-security-disability-cases-appeal-processing-time-continues-to-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indianapolis-social-security-disability-cases-appeal-processing-time-continues-to-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability Benefits Denial Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearing Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processing Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valparaiso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waiting Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The processing time for appeals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The processing time for appeals that go to hearing in Indianapolis continues to fall. At the end of November 2009, the average processing time from the Request for Hearing was 579 days.  In June of 2008 it was 896 days and in April 2009 it was 738 days.  As I noted in my <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/42/indiana-to-have-additional-hearing-office-for-social-security-disability-claim-appeals/#more-42/">June 12, 2009 post,</a> a new hearing office is supposed to be up and running in Valparaiso, IN in September 2010.  I would expect that once that office is open, SSA will reconfigure service areas of the different hearing offices so that all of the Indiana hearing offices will have shorter waiting times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indianapolis-social-security-disability-cases-appeal-processing-time-continues-to-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security Disability and Computer Usage</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/social-security-disability-and-computer-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/social-security-disability-and-computer-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability Benefits Denial Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are rumors that an]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are rumors that an administrative law judge stated in a seminar that he went on line and researched to see if the claimant had job applications pending during the claim. The speculation is that the ALJ is using on-line research skills to see if current resumes are being posted by the claimants. Why would this be important to the ALJ?</p>
<p>When you apply for Social Security Disability, you are stating that you cannot do an 8 hour a day job 5 days a week. If you have posted your resume seeking work, some might conclude that you really think you can work. The old adage “you cannot have your cake and eat it too” comes to mind. Some will conclude that you really are not disabled and you are only using the Social Security Disability system to provide you a means of support while you are looking for work. After all, if you cannot work, why would you be posting your resume seeking work?</p>
<p>Perhaps you posted a resume on line shortly before you became disabled. Have you forgotten about it? Did you remember to remove it from the site when you became unable to work? Even if you did, can it still be retrieved from the web?</p>
<p>Much has also been made in the news media about potential employers looking at social media sites such as Facebook and MySpace to see what they can learn. If someone might research you, what might they learn about you at these sites? If you participate in an online chat group, how might your comments be misconstrued? Also, if you are posting all the time, what might that say about your computer skills and your ability to concentrate? Do not assume that the postings are private because it is a disease support group web site. Who knows, your ALJ may actually belong to the support group and be reading about you.</p>
<p>There used to be an ALJ in Indianapolis that would state that he got on the SSA system the day before the hearing and personally ran the earnings records to see what it showed. He would then ask the claimant pointed questions about the latest findings. You need to be prepared to answer the ALJ’s questions about what the internet reveals about you. You may hear the ALJ begin a question with “I see on the web that…..”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/social-security-disability-and-computer-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indianapolis Social Security Disability Cases Appeal Processing Time April 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indianapolis-social-security-disability-cases-appeal-processing-time-april-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indianapolis-social-security-disability-cases-appeal-processing-time-april-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys·Indiana Speakers·Indiana State Bar·Indiana State Bar Association·Lawyers·Presentation·Seminars·Social Security·Social Security Disability·Solo·State Bar Association Processing Time for India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good news is that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is that the processing time for appeals that go to hearing in Indianapolis has fallen when compared to the times from <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/20/indianapolis-odar-average-processing-time/"> June 2008.</a>  The average processing time in Indianapolis measured from the Request for Hearing was 896 days at the end of June 2008. At the end of April 2009, the average processing  time in Indianapolis measured from the Request for Hearing was 738 days. This is a reduction of 158 days. </p>
<p>The bad news is that the wait is still over two years long from the Request for Hearing. It is important that you <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/28/social-security-disability-and-third-party-verification/">keep seeing your doctor</a>  during your long wait so that your  <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/13/medical-impairment-ability-to-work-social-security-disability/"> medical condition will be documented. </a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indianapolis-social-security-disability-cases-appeal-processing-time-april-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana To Have Additional Hearing Office for Social Security Disability Claim Appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indiana-to-have-additional-hearing-office-for-social-security-disability-claim-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indiana-to-have-additional-hearing-office-for-social-security-disability-claim-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appeals·Backlog·Broadcast·David Foster·Denials·Deputy Commissioner·Disability·Disability Claim·Disability Claims·Hearing Office·Hearings·Rules·Security Employees·Social Security·Social Security Disabi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to David V. Foster,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to David V. Foster, Deputy Commissioner of Social Security, in his June 5, 2009 Deputy Commissioner Broadcast to Social Security employees, Indiana will have an additional hearing office to hear appeals of denials of Social Security Disability claims. The new office is to be in Valparaiso, IN and is supposed to be up and running by September, 2010. Help is coming to Indiana to work down the backlog of claims so that you do not have to  <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/25/indianapolis-odar-processing-time-update/ "> wait so long for a hearing. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/indiana-to-have-additional-hearing-office-for-social-security-disability-claim-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most People Still Turned Down on Initial Social Security Disability Benefits Application in Indiana</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/most-people-still-turned-down-on-initial-social-security-disability-benefits-application-in-indiana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/most-people-still-turned-down-on-initial-social-security-disability-benefits-application-in-indiana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security Disability Benefits Denial Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denial Rates·Disability·Disability Benefits·Disability Benefits Application·Disability Claim·Disability Determination Bureau·Fiscal Year·hire a lawyer·hire an attorney·Initial Applications·Odds·People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The report for Fiscal Year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report for Fiscal Year 2008 is out on the Initial and Reconsideration denial rates for Indiana. 63.8% of the Initial Applications for disability benefits were denied and at the Reconsideration level 93.2% were denied. These levels have not changed much since<a href="http://disabilitytse.com/21/most-people-turned-down-on-initial-social-security-disability-application/"> last year.</a> </p>
<p>Most people tell me that they have heard that &#8216;everyone gets turned down twice,&#8217; but they always think it will not happen to them. With odds like these, year after year, you have to know the <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/rules/do-you-know-the-rules-of-social-security/ "> rules</a> . You need to know  <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/general/when-should-i-hire-an-attorney-for-my-disability-case/ ">when to hire</a> an attorney to represent you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/most-people-still-turned-down-on-initial-social-security-disability-benefits-application-in-indiana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek and Social Security Disability In Indianapolis</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/star-trek-and-social-security-disability-in-indianapolis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/star-trek-and-social-security-disability-in-indianapolis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability·Hearings·Indianapolis·Rules·Social Security Disability·SSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Star Trek movie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Star Trek movie is out. As I have not seen it yet, I can not tell you what you can learn about Social Security Disability hearings in Indianapolis from the new movie. I did learn a great deal about Social Security Disability hearings from the original TV show. <a href="http://disabilitytse.com/rules/do-you-know-the-rules-of-social-security/"> Click here</a> to find out what you can learn about Social Security Disability hearings from the original Star Trek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/star-trek-and-social-security-disability-in-indianapolis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More of the Priorities of Social Security and the Proposed Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.disabilitytse.com/more-of-the-priorities-of-social-security-and-the-proposed-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disabilitytse.com/more-of-the-priorities-of-social-security-and-the-proposed-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Impairment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability·Medical Impairment·Social Security·Social Security Disability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabilitytse.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As noted yesterday, with the]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As noted yesterday, with the recently released statement of Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, commending the President&#8217;s Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Request, SSA posted a link to a document that spoke about the priorities of SSA and the proposed budget. Here are some more statements of interest:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;SSA is responsible for the Nation&#8217;s two primary Federal disability programs: Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income. Over the last 5 years, our disability workloads have grown significantly, and this trend will accelerate as baby boomers reach their most disability-prone years. We cannot lose sight of the fact that this longer-term increase in disability claims is coming, regardless of when the American economy begins to recover.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The time is now, despite the challenges of the economic downturn and the hearings backlog, to modernize the disability process to avoid future backlogs and provide applicants with speedy decisions. Technological improvements alone cannot remedy the issues in the disability process. We must revise the policy and medical guidance at the core of the program to align with medical technology and knowledge. A modernized disability process will help us to better serve the public and fulfill our obligation to provide a fair process to the American people. The following initiatives form the core of our disability modernization program in FY 2010:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Improve Occupational Information for Making Disability Determinations and Decisions</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">SSA is working on the development of a new occupational information system that will replace the out-of-date Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) used in SSA&#8217;s disability determination process. The DOT was originally created by the Department of Labor (DOL) and has become a cornerstone of our disability policy. We rely on the descriptions of work in the DOT to determine whether individuals can do their usual work or any other work in the U.S. economy. However, DOL has not updated the DOT since 1991 and has no plans to do so. DOL&#8217;s replacement for the DOT, O*NET, does not serve SSA&#8217;s purposes. It is critical that we base disability determinations on current job information.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">SSA awarded contracts in 2008 for the use and evaluation of updated occupational information. In December 2008, Commissioner Astrue established the Occupational Information Development Advisory Panel to provide advice and recommendations on plans to replace the DOT. The panel advises SSA on the creation of an occupational information system for disability programs and adjudicative needs. Specifically, the panel will advise on medical and vocational analysis, occupational analysis, data collection, use of occupational information, and other areas. The panel had its first meeting in February 2009 and has three more meetings scheduled this year.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">SSA will continue its efforts to replace the DOT in FY 2010, when the agency will begin identifying the physical and mental abilities and skill levels that occupations require, developing the means of gathering occupational information, and researching assessment of residual functional capacity.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Update Medical Listings</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">SSA uses the Listings of Impairments to describe impairments considered severe enough to prevent an individual from working and earning above a defined level. The listings are a critical factor in our disability determination process; however, we have not updated some listings in decades. We are working to expand the listings to include rare disease and permanently disabling conditions. We are also working to update all of our existing listings by the end of FY 2010. We have also developed a long-term schedule to ensure that in the future we update all listings, as needed, but at least every 5-7 years. Updated listings allow disability examiners and SSA adjudicators to identify eligible applicants early in the disability determination process and result in improved disability decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>All of this sounds good in the abstract. However, ONET was going to replace the DOT for disability hearings until it was determined it would not actually work in a disability hearing. Listings have been updated and some old listings have been completely removed because the listing was supposed to be covered by the new listing; however, the ALJ&#8217;s and Medical Experts do not always understand this. SAA has rolled out other plans that were supposed to help but only made things worse. Time will tell if these &#8220;improvements&#8221; actually improve things in the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disabilitytse.com/more-of-the-priorities-of-social-security-and-the-proposed-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

